Upload your plan set and get a prioritized QA/QC report with code references in minutes. Built by engineers, for real engineering workflows.
$1 a sheet, $50 minimum per review — no subscriptionOne missed coordination issue can cost $10k–$100k+ in the field. PlanFlag costs less than one mistake.
Designed for the engineers who review, stamp, and defend the work.
Engineering firms reviewing full plan sets under tight deadlines
Multi-discipline teams coordinating across structural, civil, and MEP
QA/QC managers who need defensible documentation for every project
Engineers of Record who want consistent review across junior and senior staff
Issues that cost real money when they reach the field.
Catch missing connection details, incomplete schedules, unspecified materials, and documentation gaps across all disciplines in your plan set.
Prevents: RFIs, fabrication delays, field conflicts
Verifies design criteria against project location, checks load parameters, flags outdated code editions, and reviews requirements across IBC, ASCE, ACI, NEC, NFPA, and more.
Prevents: Plan review rejections
Cross-references design criteria across all sheets. Finds mismatches in loads, elevations, clearances, routing conflicts, and coordination gaps between disciplines.
Prevents: Coordination errors in the field
Every finding includes severity, code reference, rationale, and a clear recommendation.
Vasd does not match Vult conversion. Stated Vult = 123 mph and Vasd = 100 mph, but 123 × √0.6 = 95.3 mph. Either the ultimate or ASD wind speed is incorrect, affecting every pressure calculation in the set.
ASCE 7-22 §2.3.1Why this matters: Incorrect wind speed cascades to all C&C and MWFRS pressures. Will be caught in plan review.
Recommendation: Verify intended design wind speed. If Vult = 123 mph, Vasd should be 95.3 mph. Correct all pressure tables accordingly.
AISC 360-16 is referenced for structural steel design. The current edition is AISC 360-22, adopted by FBC 2023 and IBC 2021.
AISC 360-22 | FBC 2023Why this matters: Outdated code reference may trigger plan review comment.
Recommendation: Update all AISC references to the 360-22 edition.
"GABBLE ROOF" should read "GABLE ROOF" in the Components and Cladding pressure table header.
TypographicalRecommendation: Correct typo in next drawing revision.
Export to Excel. Track findings. Defensible QA/QC documentation.
PDF drawings with automatic text extraction. Set your project location for code-aware review.
Code, cross-sheet and math checks run automatically.
Severity-ranked findings with code references and rationale. Export to Excel in one click.
One tool for every discipline in your plan set.
PlanFlag checks your drawings against the codes that matter — structural, civil, and MEP standards.
PlanFlag assists your QA/QC process — it doesn't replace it. Every finding requires professional review.
Findings cite specific code sections (IBC, ASCE, ACI, AISC) so you can verify and defend every comment.
Export findings to Excel with severity, code references, and tracking columns. Ready to hand off or include in your review package.
One review, the full review, on every set. No subscription.
$50 minimum · up to 100 sheets per review; larger sets by quote
A hold is placed on your card before the review runs and charged when it finishes. If the review fails, the hold is released.
Upload a plan setRefund-with-feedback guarantee. Larger sets and volume pricing: sales@planflag.com.
